User login

It seems you're using an old browser...

We're sorry, but your browser is out of date. In order to view this site correctly, you may want to:

trice's Blog

Sunday Story Ratings #26: Backwash

Backwash by Frederick Nebel

Originally published May 1932 in Black Mask; this edition 1995

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Collected in: Hard-Boiled: An Anthology of American Crime Stories (ed. Bill Pronzini & Jack Adrian)

 

PG

(D, L, V)

Drug Use (??) {Character is an alcoholic; other characters alcohol and tobacco}

Coarse Language (PG) {Not much}

Violence (PG) {Again not much}

 

Representations

Gender:

I think there is exactly one woman in the story. She is important, but not active.

Sex:

Sexuality of hetero sorts is a driver of the plot, displayer implicitly.

Race & Ethnicity:

Far as I could tell, everyone is white USAian. One character by name and description might have been of southern European origin.

Disability, Physical Diversity and Health:

One character is an alcoholic, does that count?

 

Awards

None found

 

Notes

Liked this one too, although it seemed a bit odd the supposed main detective of the series played so little of a role. Actually I don't think the crime was even solved, although it worked out. Don't think that was the main concern here. This one reminded me strongly of the Harvey Dent plot-line from The Dark Knight.

Sunday Story Ratings #25: Mistral

Mistral by Raoul Whitfield

Originally published December 15, 1931 in Adventure; this edition 1995

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Collected in: Hard-Boiled: An Anthology of American Crime Stories (ed. Bill Pronzini & Jack Adrian)

 

PG

(L, D, V)

Coarse Language (PG)

Drug Use (PG) {Tobacco, alcohol}

Violence (PG) {Only one incident toward the end, dramatic and tense but not graphic}

 

Representations

Gender:

Male protagonist, male characters.

Sex:

Not noted.

Race & Ethnicity:

Mostly (presumed-)white European, some US. According to the story intro, the writer has a Spanish-Filipino detective but I don't think he's the lead here, and if the lead's ethnicity were indicated I missed it.

Disability, Physical Diversity and Health:

One character has a scar. That seems to be all.

 

Awards

Not found.

 

Notes

I liked this one. Not sure what to say about it, I suppose I found the detective character intriguing and am curious to read more of him, except I think he was a one-off. I rather felt the growing empathy and guilt wert the other guy.

Sunday Story Ratings #24: Round Trip

Round Trip by W. R. Burnett

Originally published 1929 in Harper's; this edition 1995

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Collected in: Hard-Boiled: An Anthology of American Crime Stories (ed. Bill Pronzini & Jack Adrian)

 

PG

(D, L)

Drug Use (PG) {Tobacco and alcohol}

Coarse Language (PG) {Not strong, I suppose not too frequent for so short a story}

 

Representations

Gender:

Tight third-person on male protagonist, only men have speaking parts.

Sex:

Vaguely heterosexual, in the sense that dancing with girls happens.

Race & Ethnicity:

Italian Mafiosi vs Irish cops.

Disability, Physical Diversity and Health:

The protagonist catches a random cold. That is all, I think.

 

Awards

Found no sign of any. Don't expect to find any before the second half of the century.

 

Notes

This was very short. Kind of darkly amusing with the contextually innocent Mafioso being turned around by the police.

Something queer

A few weeks ago I finished reading Don't Let Her See Me Cry: A Mother's Story, an autobiography by a Victorian woman of the sort that ends "and then I wrote this book".

Anyway, I found it interestingly jarring the way she used 'straight' to mean 'person who is not a drug-user', rather the use I am accustomed to of 'person who is heterosexual'. Not new to me as such, but definitely not what I am used to. It was weird to see sentences like "As I drove away I couldn't believe that a 'straight' person seemed to be attracted to me!" Referring of course to her first relationship with another woman after being released from prison.

What was a new word to me was 'wangle', which I had initially taken to be a mispelling of 'wrangle', but apparently is actually a word.

So there you go.

Sunday Story Ratings #23: The Scorched Face

The Scorched Face by Dashiell Hammett

Originally published May 1925 in Black Mask; this edition 1995

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Collected in: Hard-Boiled: An Anthology of American Crime Stories (ed. Bill Pronzini & Jack Adrian)

 

MA15+

(V, S, L, D)

Violence (MA15+) {Mostly obscured, too frequent and in some places I think too nasty to get away with M)

Sexual References (M) {Sexual activity implied}

Coarse Language (PG) {Mild, infrequent, only in instances of strong emotion}

Drug References (PG) {Qualifications for this don't change between PG and MA}

 

Representations

Gender:

Narration is first-person from a male perspective. Other characters almost exclusively male, except interviewees.

Sex:

Sexuality is hetero male oriented, any implication of sexual interaction between women in context of male-centred group sex. Said orgies being depicted as sufficiently shameful to ruin the participants' lives.

Race & Ethnicity:

West-coast US, almost entirely white. Some characters referred to by ethnicities of European origin, e.g. Italian. Small number of black characters appear in servant / bodyguard role, referred to alternately as 'black' or 'Negroes'.

Disability, Physical Diversity and Health:

None noticed.

 

Awards

Unknown, presumed none.

 

Notes

I started reading this story on a short break during my one of my shifts. Even reading just a few pages I was impressed by Hammett's technique. Feels like I could learn a lot about brevity in mystery construction. Very taught, effectively written. Can see why he would have been such an influential figure.

Sunday Story Ratings #22: Excel Saga Mission 1: The Initiation of a Legend

Volume 1, Mission 1: The Initiation of a Legend by Rikdo Koshi

Originally published 1997 by Shonengahosha Co.. Ltd, Tokyo; this edition July 2003, September 2003 printing

Publisher: Viz

 

M

(V, S, L)

Violence (M) {Mainly off-screen, for comedic purposes}

Sexual References (PG)

Language (PG)

 

Representations

Gender:

Female protagonist, not particularly tightly bound camera. Mostly male extras, all others with speaking parts are men.

Sex:

One panel indicates Excel's past jobs have included sex work. Elsewise, she has an apparently romantic obsession with Lord Il Palazzo, to the point of talking to his photo when she is home as if they live together. No other indications of romance or sexuality.

Race & Ethnicity:

All characters presumed Japanese

Disability, Physical Diversity and Health:

None, unless one counts Excel's tendency to rewrite her memory so that she was the victim of conspiratorial violence rather than fatally incompetent at work.

 

Awards

None found.

 

Tropes

Evil Overlord

Bishōnen

Take Over the City

Villain Protagonist

Genki Girl

Companion Cube

Passed Over Promotion

Punch Clock Villain

Why Do You Keep Changing Jobs?

Conspiracy Theorist

 

Notes

Running late due to belatedly realising I had an assignment due this morning. That was unfortunate.

 

And here we have our emergency back-up story, Excel Saga. We would have run into this problem earlier if I'd been on time with the previous two ratings, as I've caught up on my reading with these. I did actually finish reading one book since The Saints of the Sword, but as that was an autobiography I don't feel right rating it (if I did, it would probably be R18+ or RC due to descriptions of drug use). Anyway, Excel Saga. I bought the first volume of this series early in the millennium or possibly at the beginning of the previous one, after watching the anime series based on it. Because graphic works are relatively quick to read, and I've been trying to get myself to read through and decide if I want to keep collecting the series, it seemed an excellent choice of back-up for when my regular reading patterns leave me unsupplied with a story to rate.

 

Very short, though. Not much happens in the first story. Mainly we meet the dangerously incompetent protagonist Excel and the mysterious, sadistic would-be conqueror Il Palazzo she has pledged herself to. And the pit he drops her into, repeatedly. Minor appearance by Watanabe (unnamed) at the end, and single-panel cameo by dog / future emergency food supply Menchi / Mince (also unnamed). Plot mainly consists in this case of illustrative distractibility and incompetence on the part of our protagonist for humour.

 

There you go.

No Are

Thought briefly today about conducting my life as if I have only a short time left to live. But, I decided that for me this is incompatible with living as if I might have a longer term future. What I'd do for one would sabotage the other, and if I'm to gamble on one I'd rather aim for the more desirable possibility.

I don't know what I would do, anyway. I take the goal as to finish without regrets ([1]). I have always thought that if I discovered I had some short time left in which to live I would use it to write as much as I could, to leave as much story behind as I were able to. That has been my standing plan.

These days I would not be able to carry it out. I have shed my stories and I have vastly less to write now than I did ten years ago. The same ideas still around if I want to call them up, more or less, but they have ceased to be compelling. Even though I have no literary aspirations I would want what I write to be executed well and these days I find neither spark of that nor urge to place it. Most - not all - of what I have of recent is porn, and while I don't mind that being my legacy, I do not think I would feel a need to fill my final days with its feverish typing. Perhaps I no longer think myself so significant the world must not be denied my work to marvel at.

Let's not be morbid. I think these days my effort would be spent on the presence of my loved ones. There is no accomplishment to be had. How would I decide which tale most urgent to tell, or which books are too important to miss out on? Nothing else, just company.

I am apart from them now because I believe we have a long future, not a brief one, by human scales, and because I believe by doing so I will be better equiped to contribute to our long-term financial security and comfort in life (and not least to minimise my avenues for self-hatred in a life shared). This is not compatible with the alternative, so I am hoping we do not get unlucky.

[1] Do I say minimal regrets? Do I say regret is bound into making decisions, choosing one thing and not another? Maybe, but right now the ones I remember with weight seem like if I'd done different there'd be nothing to regret. Mostly I am regretting the paths which have left me more damaged or less functional in this society. Delayed functionality, at best. And at the time, I did not understand.

Not talking

Haven't been posting much, again. Which happens. For example, I did not mention being nearly involved in a driving accident a few weeks ago.

I was driving to class when I noticed a car swinging into the lane just ahead of me. I had to brake abruptly not to run into them. It took a few moments to realise a banging sound I had heard just previously must have been another car hitting that one and knocking it into my path. The car which nearly hit me recovered and I saw them shortly pull over behind another car which had one corner at the back smashed up. I think there must have been at least three vehicles involved.

It left me shaken much of the rest of the drive. The incident impressed on me that many accidents must be little like those which make the news, that the cars were still driveable and intact apart from dents and body damage so far as I could see (I saw damage only on one) and that there was some measure of recovery available.

Not that this encourages me to be careless about the possibility of being in a collision. But at least those people seem to have escaped only expensively. That was on my first time driving that route too; I am glad it has been a one-off incident so far, and not something to expect on a regular commute.

Sunday Story Ratings #21: The Saints of the Sword

The Saints of the Sword by John Marco (Tyrants and Kings #3)

Originally published 2001; this edition 2002

Publisher: Gollancz

 

MA15+

(H, S, L, V)

Supernatural Themes

Sexual References {G}

Coarse Language

Violence {MA 15+}

Drug References {PG}

 

Representations

Gender:

A few POVs, all men. A bisexual character from the first book is described increasingly androgynously as the series continues. A trans person is described in historical context as having been driven to mass murder by her dysphoria.

Sex:

Continues to be only one character who is not heterosexual. I continue to wonder who he actually has sex with, if no other men are shown as being interested.

Race & Ethnicity:

Most characters white. One character is biracial.

Disability, Physical Diversity and Health:

text

Tropes:

War is Hell

Colonel Kilgore

Category Traitor

The Dragon (somewhat of a Smug Snake this time)

Hurting Hero (Healing Hero, at last)

The Empire (Industrial Roman flavour)

The Dark Side Will Make You Forget (actually listed on the site)

Utopia Justifies the Means (likewise mentioned above)

Super Serum

Psycho Serum (multi-function serum!)

Conflicting Loyalty (back to the original person, plus some new folk)

Past Victim Showcase (different victim, different target, same guy behind the package)

Fantasy Counterpart Culture

Crystal Dragon Jesus (where the crystal dragon is Yahweh?)

Mighty Whitey

Fire Breathing Weapon

The Extremist Was Right

Obligatory War Crime Scene (have some more)

Older Thank They Look

The Chessmaster

Insane Admiral

General Ripper

Heel Realisation

Heel Face Turn

Redemption Quest

0% Approval Rating

Revenge Before Reason

Bring Help Back

Kick the Dog

Puberty Superpower

Healing Hands

Telepathy

Lethal Harmless Powers

Heroic Bastard

Earn Your Happy Ending

 

Awards

None of note.

I overlooked one from last week, too: Restrained Revenge.

 

This book I ordered when I started The Jackal of Nar, way back in February. And I finally, finally get my happy ending here. George Lucas has been known to say that Star Wars is really the story of Darth Vader's fall and redemption, but I think the Tyrants and Kings trilogy tells a similar story much better. The Emperor's sinister and feared Dragon, who abruptly murders various people in his displeasure, commits heinous acts and sinks to the depths of depravity in pursuit of revenge on the young hero who foiled his master's plans. (said young man having also turned down an offer of We Can Rule Together) But, spurred by the example of his defeated rival and the arguments of others around him, including pawns in his revenge scheme, he turns away from the dark side, fighting his addiction in resolute determination to become a better person and rule what is now his empire for peace and the betterment of the empire itself. But everyone thinks he is still a monster.

 

I suppose everyone else would have to decide for themselves whether the terrible things he has done are forgivable (and they made me weep, although others have their atrocities too), but I at least feel I got my happy ending. After three volumes of wartime brutality, more than 2300 pages of interpersonal conflict, scheming, rivalry and revenge, the (surviving, recurring) characters finally put aside their differences to work together. Maybe it wasn't quite the friendship ending I was hoping for, but we are invited to consider the beginning of a better, more peaceful era for this world.

Sunday Story Ratings #20: The Grand Design

 

The Grand Design by John Marco (Tyrants and Kings #2)

Originally published 2000; this edition 2001

Publisher: Gollancz

 

R18+

(V, H, S, L, D, N)

Violence {R 18+; genocide, chemical warfare, torture}

Supernatural themes and references {no weight}

A Sex Scene {M}

Coarse Language {M}

Drug Use {PG}

Nudity {G}

 

Representations

Gender:

A broader scattering of POVs, at least one female. There is a conversation between two women, but it features a couple of men prominently.

Sex:

Sex is relegated to off-screen, or referenced as having happened in the past. One antagonist is described several times as bisexual (although not by that word). Antagonists of a different faction hold religious objections to homosexual acts (described incongruously as 'sodomy'), while the aforementioned character's friends maintain that sexual orientation is irrelevant to them. Otherwise this is a rather straight world.

Race & Ethnicity:

More prominent presence of people from Liss, considered ethnically related to those of Triin (that so far as I know fictitious race from the first book), but less overall presence of either than the first book, except one continuing major character. Most characters white, some of fictitious possibly-white ethnicity. One relatively minor character is bi-racial.

Disability, Physical Diversity and Health:

One character has had their physical development stopped at childhood due to medical experimentation. One character is repeatedly described as 'a midget'.

Tropes:

War is Hell

Colonel Kilgore

Category Traitor

The Dragon

Hurting Hero

The Empire (Industrial Roman flavour)

Complete Monster

The Dark Side Will Make You Forget (actually listed on the site)

Utopia Justifies the Means (likewise mentioned above)

Super Serum

Psycho Serum (multi-function serum!)

Dead Little Sister 

Conflicting Loyalty (different person, much more tragic)

Revenge by Proxy (that's two wives now, and someone else's fiancée.)

Past Victim Showcase (different victim, different target, same guy behind the package)

Finger in the Mail

Fantasy Counterpart Culture

Crystal Dragon Jesus (where the crystal dragon is Yahweh?)

Mighty Whitey

You Kill It, You Bought It (this time, an army of ravens)

Fire Breathing Weapon

Hollywood Acid (as artillery)

Deadly Gas (It's your old friend, deadly neurotoxin. If I were you, I would take a deep breath. And hold it.) (although the gas actually has nastier effects like bleeding diathesis)

Tears of Blood

Hopeless Suitor

Incompatible Orientation

The Extremist Was Right

Obligatory War Crime Scene (new ones!)

Duel to the Death

Older Thank They Look

Brainwashed

The Chessmaster

Insane Admiral

General Ripper

High Priest

Knight Templar

Sibling Triangle

Family Relationship Switcheroo

Batman Gambit

Heel Realisation

Not What I Signed On For

Redemption Quest

You're Insane!

Torture Technician

Cold-Blooded Torture

I have Your Wife

Revenge Before Reason

Kick the Dog

Pet the Dog

Morality Pet

Before I Change My Mind

 

Awards

None of note.

Not done one of these in a couple of weeks. Oops. I was a bit busy with school stuff and having some minor renovation foisted on me.
From the early stages of this book, I was looking forward to reading something else in the future, with a lighter and happier tone. So far not much luck, but I remain optimistic. Not that I disliked the book or have much bad to say about it (or much good, since it has been a while now since reading it :-/).
Even more so than the previous book, the outcome I rooted for was (most) of the characters getting together, talking to each other and settling their differences amicably. They don't have to be set against each other, but madness and drug addiction and (on one of the several sides) religious fanatacism interferes with their judgement. At least things get better and worse toward the end, with talk and the evidence of his enemies getting through to a vengeance-hardened heart. Made me optimistic about the following and final volume.
Also pleasantly surprised that the 'sending a little girl to seduce the priest' plot didn't go how I expectected.